Comments on: A review of The Courtiers’ Anatomists: Animals and Humans in Louis XIV’s Paris by Anita Guerrini https://dev.jessicaotis.com/2023/03/27/a-review-of-the-courtiers-anatomists-animals-and-humans-in-louis-xivs-paris-by-anita-guerrini/ HIST 615/635 Spring 2023 Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:59:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 By: Some Random Dude https://dev.jessicaotis.com/2023/03/27/a-review-of-the-courtiers-anatomists-animals-and-humans-in-louis-xivs-paris-by-anita-guerrini/#comment-57 Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:59:57 +0000 https://dev.jessicaotis.com/?p=601#comment-57 Laszlo,

I liked your paragraph on the “spectacle” aspect. The fact that Louis eventually lost interest in the project puts more weight on the possibility that these demonstrations were predominantly power displays. Sort of a cross between a modern TED talk or Royal Institution Youtube lecture and the entertainment value of a public execution. It’s interesting that this era produced the first zoo where animals were organized on the basis of species, yet the dissection project did not really lay much groundwork for evolutionary theory. This “spectacular” quality, as well as the accessibility of anatomical drawings (which did not require much knowledge of Latin for comprehension) goes a long way toward explaining why anatomy became the first “popular” science, in my view.

]]>
By: Laszlo Taba https://dev.jessicaotis.com/2023/03/27/a-review-of-the-courtiers-anatomists-animals-and-humans-in-louis-xivs-paris-by-anita-guerrini/#comment-56 Wed, 29 Mar 2023 19:30:15 +0000 https://dev.jessicaotis.com/?p=601#comment-56 Kevin and Alex, both of you made the same comment about my focus on the author, so I figure I’d reply to both of you here at once.

First, thanks very much for the kind words. I see what you’re saying about being too focused on Guerrini. I was on a roll, so I didn’t redirect my attention when I should have. I’ll keep that in mind in my next review.

One of the issues I have is keeping my reviews flowing. I feel like either I’m rushing through it to get to what I think are the bigger issues, or, after I get caught up in the details of one chapter, I try to do the same with the rest of the chapters, even if they aren’t equally important. Thanks again for your comments. They’re really helpful!

Laszlo

]]>
By: Kevin Twohig https://dev.jessicaotis.com/2023/03/27/a-review-of-the-courtiers-anatomists-animals-and-humans-in-louis-xivs-paris-by-anita-guerrini/#comment-55 Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:27:09 +0000 https://dev.jessicaotis.com/?p=601#comment-55 Hi Laszlo! First, excellent review! You have a lot in here and manage to balance quite a few topics and ideas which I think helps synthesize the book extremely well. I agree with Alex that it does seem as though you spend a lot more time in discussion of Guerrini, her background, and her intentions in the book which is somewhat of a divergence from most of our reviews; I truly think this works well, especially in the way that you utilize her background and interest in France/Paris and scientific history to help reconstruct her intentions in the arguments she makes and the details she chooses to include in order to make her point. In addition, I think that your inclusion and focus on very particular instances and quotes from the book are very poignant in their revealing some of the bigger themes and arguments Guerrini includes; very well done!

]]>
By: Alexander Chin https://dev.jessicaotis.com/2023/03/27/a-review-of-the-courtiers-anatomists-animals-and-humans-in-louis-xivs-paris-by-anita-guerrini/#comment-54 Wed, 29 Mar 2023 01:40:14 +0000 https://dev.jessicaotis.com/?p=601#comment-54 Hi Laszlo, I think you wrote a very interesting review of The Courtiers’ Anatomists with a slightly different format than I have seen in other reviews. In your review, you focus far more on the author than I have seen in previous reviews, and I think this is an interesting choice. It brought more agency to what the author chose to do instead of focusing on how the book did things. This felt like it brought a more conversational tone to your review, making it more fun to read. Although this made your review very interesting, it felt as though it may have detracted from some of the information you could have presented on the content of the book. The other aspect of your review I found interesting was your point about the book not proving the agency of non-human actors within the book. I think the book did show the importance of non-humans in science because of their need as subjects, but I agree that this does not show agency. Overall, I think you wrote a good review in an interesting way with a different focus than I have seen in some of the other reviews.

]]>